Dimensions are generally referred to as criteria, the rating scale as levels, and definitions as descriptors. Herman, Aschbacher, and Winters  distinguish the following elements of a scoring rubric: One or more traits or dimensions that serve as the basis for judging the student response Definitions and examples to clarify the meaning of each trait or dimension A scale of values on which to rate each dimension Standards of excellence for specified performance levels accompanied by models or examples of each level Since the s, many scoring rubrics have been presented in a graphic format, typically as a grid.
A review of critical thinking tests can be found at the web site of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative US Department of Education at http: Departments typically use the A version as a pre-test before students begin the program or course and the B version as a post-test.
Critical thinking occurs in the context of a course, so there is a a trend for developing context-specific thinking tests. Insight Assessment has a test that measures reasoning in the health sciences. Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric Peter Facione and Noreen Facione have developed the four-level Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric to assess the critical thinking skills and some of the dispositions identified by the Delphi project as these skills are demonstrated by by students in essays, projects, presentations, clinical practices, and such.
The Facione and Facione Holistic Scoring Rubric is copied below and is available free, with a page of instructions, at http: Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc. Identifies the salient arguments reasons and claims pro and con.
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons.
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead. Identifies relevant arguments reasons and claims pro and con. Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view. Justifies some results or procedures, explains reasons.
Fairmindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead. Does most or many of the following: Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc. Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments.
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. Justifies few results or procedures, seldom explains reasons.
Regardless of the evidence or reasons maintains or defends views based on self-interest or preconceptions. Offers biased interpretations of evidence, statements, graphics, questions, information, or the points of view of others. Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments.
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims.
Exhibits close-mindedness or hostility to reason. Analytical Critical Thinking Scoring Rubrics Analytical rubrics provide more information than holistic rubrics. The holistic rubric illustrated above combines five different kinds of thinking into a single category.
The WSU rubric specifies only the highest and lowest levels of performances, leaving it to faculty adapting it to describe the intervening levels.Six Traits Writing Rubrics.
6 + 1 Traits Essay Rubrics. Six Traits Narrative Writing Rubric. Six Traits Paragraph Rubric. Six Traits Writing Rubric. Find the Resources You Need!
Search. More Teaching Resources: • Academic's Choice - Award-Winning Educational Media & Toys.
The core of the 6+1 Trait® Writing Model of Instruction & Assessment is the set of rubrics that specify how to assess the quality of student writing and tailor instruction to students’ needs. Here are some essay writing rubrics to help you get started grading your students’ essays.
You will probably have to customize these rubrics to meet your goals and standards, but these should give you a decent place to start. Providing educators and students access to the highest quality practices and resources in reading and language arts instruction.
1. List and define the components of 6 .Traits of Writing. 2. Develop connections to curriculum. 3. Analyze and evaluate present evaluation .system to the 6 Traits of writing rubrics. 4. Synthesize the information to create lesson .plan(s).
Common Core State Standards Samples of Student Writing, Scored With a 6+1 Trait Rubric (PDF, MB, pgs.) supplies samples of K writing and teacher responses. Research supplies studies of the importance of writing, strategies for teaching writing, and the efficacy of the 6+1 Trait Writing Model. Why has the 6+1 TRAIT model had such a tremendous impact on writing instruction? Because it works. It allows teachers to pinpoint students’ strengths and weaknesses in ideas, organization, voice, word choice, sentence fluency, conventions, and presentation, and focus instruction. Annotation: Control of conventions is evident in sentence structure and variety, and in consistently correct punctuation that includes commas, apostrophes, dashes, question marks and exclamation points.
6+1 Traits Of Writing. writing is organized. Flow & rhythm (sentence fluency) All sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and has an obvious emphasis. Almost all sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 are awkward or difficult to understand.
Most sentences sound natural and are easy.